If you're looking for a way to create bunkafu notation, you'll run into everything from handwriting to specialized desktop software. Here we compare four common options fairly, by strengths, caveats, and price.
Four options
1. Handwriting
The classic, free approach — no tools required. Editing mistakes is slow, though, and a clean copy takes time.
2. Wagaku Hitosuji (desktop software)
A long-established Windows desktop tool built specifically for Japanese instrument notation, with strong print output. Less convenient if you live on phone/Mac only.
3. ShamiTAB (open source)
A free, open-source bunkafu tool. Great if you're comfortable extending code yourself, but the GUI is minimal.
4. Shami (web / mobile)
A browser-based app whose bunkafu editor you can try before signing in. After creating a free account, you can use the included allowance to photograph a printed bunkafu score and have AI create a digital draft. Free to start, with an optional premium tier.
Comparison
| Tool | Good for | Caveats | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Handwriting | Free, no tools needed | Slow to edit and finalize | Free |
| Wagaku Hitosuji | Established, print-ready output | Windows-focused, less mobile-friendly | Paid (one-time) |
| ShamiTAB | Free, open-source, extensible | Developer-oriented, minimal GUI | Free |
| Shami | Try the editor before login; photo-to-score AI import after free registration | Doesn't cover every school-specific notation detail | Free to start (premium available) |
Shami runs in your browser with no install. You can try the editor before signing in; photo and PDF AI import is available after free registration.
Try it free on the web →